Thursday, March 20, 2014

You will be able to test and approve what God’s will is

Romans 12:2
(NIV)
Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.
(AMP)
Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.
2 Tim 2:15
(NIV)
Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth.
(AMP)
Study and be eager and do your utmost to present yourself to God approved (tested by trial), a workman who has no cause to be ashamed, correctly analyzing and accurately dividing [rightly handling and skillfully teaching] the Word of Truth.
John 6:24-40 & 66-69
(KJV)
When the people therefore saw that Jesus was not there, neither his disciples, they also took shipping, and came to Capernaum, seeking for Jesus.
And when they had found him on the other side of the sea, they said unto him, Rabbi, when camest thou hither?
Jesus answered them and said, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Ye seek me, not because ye saw the miracles, but because ye did eat of the loaves, and were filled.
Labour not for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto everlasting life, which the Son of man shall give unto you: for him hath God the Father sealed.
Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?
Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.
They said therefore unto him, What sign shewest thou then, that we may see, and believe thee? what dost thou work?
Our fathers did eat manna in the desert; as it is written, He gave them bread from heaven to eat.
Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Moses gave you not that bread from heaven; but my Father giveth you the true bread from heaven.
For the bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven, and giveth life unto the world.
Then said they unto him, Lord, evermore give us this bread.
And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.
But I said unto you, That ye also have seen me, and believe not.
All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of Him that sent me.
And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day.
And this is the will of Him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.

From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him. Then said Jesus unto the twelve, Will ye also go away? Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life. And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living God.

References:
New International Version (NIV)—Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society
Amplified Bible (AMP)—Copyright © 1954, 1958, 1962, 1964, 1965, 1987 by The Lockman Foundation

King James Version (KJV)—Public Domain/ 1604, King James I of England

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Study

2 Timothy 2:15 (*Amplified Bible)
Study and be eager and do your utmost to present yourself to God approved (tested by trial), a workman who has no cause to be ashamed, correctly analyzing and accurately dividing [rightly handling and skillfully teaching] the Word of Truth.


*Copyright © 1954, 1958, 1962, 1964, 1965, 1987 by The Lockman Foundation

Saturday, February 22, 2014

Chronological Order Of The Books Of The New Testament

While no arrangement of these books can be made with absolute confidence, the following dates are sufficiently reliable to serve the purpose of the Bible student.
 
James - 50 A.D. 1st & 2nd Thessalonians - 52-53.   
Galatians - 55. 1st & 2nd Corinthians - 57. Romans - 57-58.   
Philippians - 62-63. Colossians - 62-63. Philemon - 62-63.   
Ephesians - 62-63. Luke - 63. Acts - 64. 1st Timothy - 65.   
Titus - 65. 2nd Timothy - 66. Mark - 66. Matthew - 67. 
Hebrews - 67. 1st & 2nd Peter - 67-68.    Jude - 68. 
Revelation - 68. John - c. 85. Epistles of John - 90-95.

2 I suppose I must have read as many myths as most men in Latin and Greek as well as, in translation, in other European and Asiatic languages. They can be helpful. Even now we can “get the message” of the Sirens of Circe about whom Homer wrote nearly three thousand years ago. But, apart from the Book of Revelation, which stands in a class by itself, the New Testament is not a myth. Its sparse vocabulary, its lack of writing for effect, its general atmosphere of understatement is miles removed from the fantastic world of magic and myth.

Here in the dark, cruel, fear-ridden world of what we now call the first century, there came to birth in such unlikely places as Corinth and Ephesus, a new kind of human being and human community. Perhaps I was fortunate in starting, not in some “quest for the historical Jesus,” but in the most intimate imaginative contact with the letters of Paul.

For here I found real people, real situations, real victories, and a few real failures.

Here is irrefutable evidence, that long before any “Gospel” was written, people were being fundamentally changed in character and outlook. This new unquenchable courage and certainty about God was never dreamed up.

The more closely I studied, the more I felt the hallmark of reality and the ring of truth.

3 When and how did the Twelve Apostles die?

Summary:  The Bible only mentions the deaths of two apostles, James who was put to death by Herod Agrippa I in 44 AD and Judas Iscariot who committed suicide shortly after the death of Christ.    The details of the deaths of three of the apostles (John, the Beloved, Bartholomew and Simon the Canaanite) are not known at all, either by tradition or early historians. The deaths of the other seven apostles are known by tradition or the writings of early Christian historians. According to traditions and the Bible, eight of the Apostles died as Martyrs.  At least two of the Apostles, Peter and Andrew were crucified. [Jesus died in 33 AD]

Simon surnamed Peter died 33-34 years after the death of Christ.  According to Smith’s Bible Dictionary there is “satisfactory evidence that he and Paul were the founders of the church at Rome, and died in that city. The time and manner of the apostle’s martyrdom are less certain. According to the early writers, he died at or about the same time with Paul, and in the Neronian persecution, A.D. 67,68. All agree that he was crucified. Origen says that Peter felt himself to be unworthy to be put to death in the same manner as his Master, and was therefore, at his own request, crucified with his head downward.” [Paul had his head cut off]

James the son of Zebedee: He was put to death by Herod Agrippa I shortly before the day of the Passover, in the year 44 or about 11 years after the death of Christ.  From Acts 12: 1-2.

John: No death date given by early writers.  Death date is by conjecture only and is variously assigned as being between 89 AD to 120 AD

Andrew:  No accurate death date given. A variety of traditions say he preached in Scythia, in Greece, in Asia Minor and Thrace.  He is reported to have been crucified at Patrae in Achaia.

Philip:  Again, the Bible does not say when he died nor do we have accurate information.  According to tradition he preached in Phrygia, and died at Hierapolis. Update: FoxNews July 27, 2011 Tomb of the Apostle Phillip is found in Hierapolis.

Bartholomew: There is no information concerning his death, not even by tradition

Matthew: He must have lived many years as an apostle, since he was the author of the Gospel of Matthew which was written at least twenty years after the death of Christ. There is reason to believe that he stayed for fifteen years at Jerusalem, after which he went as missionary to the Persians, Parthians and Medes. There is a legend that he died a martyr in Ethiopia.

Thomas: The earlier traditions, as believed in the fourth century, say he preached in Parthia or Persia, and was finally buried at Edessa. The later traditions carry him farther east.   His martyrdom whether in Persia or India, is said to have been by a lance, and is commemorated by the Latin Church on December 21 the Greek Church on October 6, and by the Indians on July 1.

James Alpheus : We know he lived at least five years after the death of Christ because of mentions in the Bible.  According to tradition, James son of Alpheus was thrown down from the temple by the scribes and Pharisees; he was then stoned, and his brains dashed out with a fuller’s club.

Simon the Canaanite – No information either in the Bible or by tradition.

Jude (Thaddeus): according to tradition Jude taught in Armenia, Syria and Persia where he was martyred.  Tradition tells us he was buried in Kara Kalisa in what is now Iran.

Judas Iscariot: Shortly after the death of Christ Judas killed himself. According to the Bible he hanged himself, (Matthew 27:5) at Aceldama, on the southern slope of the valley of Hinnom, near Jerusalem, and in the act he fell down a precipice and was dashed into pieces.

4 According to the period writer Clemens Alexandrinus, as James the Great (the son of Zebedee) was lead to his death his accuser was so moved by his courage and faith that he fell at his feet, accepted Christ, and requested a pardon for James or else martyrdom for himself. Both were beheaded.

John, brother of James the Great, was the only apostle who did not suffer a violent death. An attempt was made, however. After he survived boiling in oil without injury, a divine miracle, he was exiled to the Isle of Patmos where the book of Revelation was written. Then in Ephesus upon his release he found those who were teaching that Jesus was only a spirit when He resurrected; thus his many referrals to Jesus being flesh & bone!


1 Chronological Order:
2 For This Day, 365 Meditations by J.B. Phillips; Word Books Publisher1975 – February 21.

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Hot-to-Boiling Faith

Phm 1:6 (KJV)
That the 1 communication of thy faith may become 2 effectual by the acknowledging of every good thing which is in you in Christ Jesus.

active sense of impartation, as communication, contribution, almsgiving.
1 Vincent's Word Studies in the New Testament (VWS) Published in 1886 by Marvin R. Vincent

2 G1756 – Strong’s; ἐνεργής energēs (en-er-gace')
From G1722 and G2041; active, operative: - effectual, powerful.
2Strong’s Concordance: Greek & Hebrew Dictionary; Published in 1890 by James Strong

3 effectual – superhuman power,
3 Vincent's Word Studies in the New Testament (VWS) Published in 1886 by Marvin R. Vincent

1, 2, 3 Retrieved from e-Sword www.e-sword.net


My Declaration:
The impartation, contribution and communion of my faith with others becomes energized with superhuman power by the full and accurate knowledge of every good thing which is in me in Christ.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
James 5:16 (KJV)
The effectual 4 fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much.

 4 “Fervent" (from Latin fervere, "to boil") Hot-to-boiling
4 International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia


. . . The effectual fervent 5G1754 – Strong’s
 ἐνεργέω energeō (en-erg-eh'-o)
From 5G1756; to be active, efficient: - do, (be) effectual (fervent), be mighty in, shew forth self, work (effectually in).

5Strong’s Concordance: Greek & Hebrew Dictionary; Published in 1890 by James Strong

(AMP)
. . . The earnest (heartfelt, continued) prayer of a righteous man makes tremendous power available [6 dynamic in its working].

6 a dynamo; generator; nuclear power plant

My Declaration:

Because I am in right standing with God, my earnest, effectual hot-to-boiling fervent prayers act like a dynamo – able to generate and make tremendous spiritual nuclear power available!

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

An Open Mind

Often Christians are, asked ‘to keep an open mind,’  by a friend who declares there are many ways to God. I believe that’s a great opportunity and a fantastic open door to witness to our friend for asking us such a loaded question. Here’s a dialog we could possible have,   

My response,

Me: That’s fine. Will you keep an open mind too if I ask you who you believe Jesus is?

They generally will say,

Friend: Yes, He was a great teacher.

Me: Cool, so you trust everything Jesus taught?

Friend: Well, I guess so.

Me: Great! Because Jesus says, ‘you will die in your sin if you don’t believe who I have said I Am.’

Friend: WOW, Who did Jesus say he was?

Me: Jesus says He was God almighty, the Son of God in the flesh!

Our dumbfounded friend utters,

Friend: WOW

Me: Jesus says in one place, ‘I and the Father are One;’ and in another place, ‘I Am the ONLY way to the Father.’

Friend: You mean there aren't many ways to get to God?

Me: Nope, not according to Jesus. So do you still believe Jesus was a great teacher?

Friend: I don’t know.

Me: That’s wonderful, you have done exactly what Jesus teaches us to do!

Friend: It is?

Me: Yes, Proverbs says not to lean upon our own thinking, our own understanding; and Jesus says, you must change your mind and become like a child or you will never be able to see or even enter the kingdom of Heaven.

Friend: What do you mean by ‘change my mind,’ about what?

Me: Jesus says, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand. The word repent is a military term, it means, ‘to change our mind; to make an about face’ about something. We are to completely turn all the way around and change our mind about what we think the kingdom of Heaven is.

As you know, where there is a kingdom there has to be a king. We have to surrender our life and swear allegiance to the King of Heaven. Christianity is not a Democracy. Jesus will not accept allegiance to any other kingdom but His. Jesus is Lord! He’s the King of kings, Lord of lords.

Our friend injects,

Friend: That sounds too simple to do, it sounds so simple even a child could understand it.

Me: You got it my friend! If people only knew how simple it is to change our mind about God, they would be breaking down our front doors, not to rob us, but to wake us up at night begging to hear more about Jesus!”

Friend: WOW, how do I surrender to Jesus?”

Me: It’s all by grace, God’s unmerited favor, it’s a gift from God that we can be part of His Kingdom. He gives us the right to be in His Kingdom. We cannot earn it. In the Bible verses from Romans 10:9-10 it says, ‘If you surrender you life and swear allegiance openly with your mouth that Jesus is Lord, Jesus is God, come in the flesh, and believe in your heart that His Father has raised Him from the dead, you shall be saved. For with your heart you believe everything Jesus taught was true and that causes you now by grace to be in a right relationship with Him, His Father and the Holy Spirit; and now by God’s unmerited favor your mouth’s declaration is turned unto salvation!’

Friend: I don’t know everything that Jesus taught.

Me: That’s good, because nobody does. The Apostle John said if all the WORDS that Jesus taught were written down in books, the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen! We don’t have to know everything about God, only He does, but we do have to believe everything He says is true! How ‘bout it, what do you declare now?

Friend: “WOW, I surrender my life and swear allegiance openly with my mouth that Jesus is Lord, Jesus is God, come in the flesh, and I believe in my heart that His Father raised Jesus from the dead, I am saved! For with my heart I believe all what Jesus has taught was true and that causes me now by grace to be in a right relationship with Him, His Father and the Holy Spirit; and now with God’s unmerited favor my mouth’s declaration is turned unto salvation!”

Me: Bingo!



Both: Glory to God! Praise the Lord! Hallelujah!

Saturday, January 18, 2014

Sprang From The Jailhouse Of Darkness

I feel we need to preach the true Gospel (Good News) of what God has done "in Christ" 
[my words are in italics—Jim]

Colossians 1:13 1st 6 Versions are from *Mark Hankins:
(KJV) who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son:
(New English) He has rescued us from the domain of darkness and brought us away into the kingdom of his dear Son,
(Wade) For God has rescued us from the dominance exercised by the Powers of Spiritual Darkness, and transferred us to the dominion of His Son—the Object of His love—
(Amplified) [The Father] has delivered us and drawn us to Himself out of the control and dominion of darkness and has transferred us into the kingdom of the Son of His love,
(Moffatt) rescuing us from the power of Darkness and transferring us to the realm of his beloved Son.
(Cotton Patch) It was the Father who sprang us from the jailhouse of darkness, and turned us loose in the new world of his beloved Son,

The following commentaries were added, transcribed and edited by Jim Hughes:

(Barnes) And hath translated us - The word rendered here “translated” is often used in the sense of:
  • Removing a people from one country to another; see Josephus, Ant. ix. 11. 1.
  • They who are Christians have been transferred from one kingdom to another, as if a people were thus removed.
  • They become subjects of a new kingdom, are under different laws, and belong to a different community.
  • This change is made in regeneration, by which we pass from the kingdom of darkness to the kingdom of light;
  • From the empire of sin, ignorance, and misery, to one of holiness, knowledge, and happiness.
  • No change, therefore, in a man’s life is so important as this; and no words can suitably express the gratitude which they should feel who are thus transferred from the empire of darkness to that of light.

(Clarke) Translated us into the kingdom, etc - He has thoroughly changed our state, brought us out of the dark region of vice and impiety, and placed us in the kingdom under the government of his dear Son, Υἱου της αγαπης αὑτου, the Son of his love; the person whom, in his infinite love, he has given to make an atonement for the sin of the world.


We have been completely REMOVED from the world we knew before coming to Christ! As far as we are concerned that old world is dead and gone!

2 Corinthians 5:17-19
(KJV)
17 Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. 18 And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation; 19 To wit that God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them: and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.

What does to wit mean in verse 19? 

I’ve combined several online sources that pretty much agree that it’s a legal term meaning "in other words” “in particular" or "namely" or "that is to say" or “as follows” or “for example”
To wit . . .
Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation; in other words God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them: and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.
[Just the “To wit” was changed from the KJV – w/no verse numbers]

The Father was in Christ reconciling us to Himself and He wants any man in Christ also to reconcile others to Himself; He’s committed unto us the word of reconciliation (in other words) the Father is not imputing their trespasses unto them. —Jim

The first 2 versions are from Mark Hankins:
2 Corinthians 5:19
(Beck) In Christ, God was getting rid of the enmity between himself and the people of the world.
(Wand) That ministry is based on the fact that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, wiping out the debit balance of our transgressions and setting His reconciliation to the credit of our account.
(Good News) Our message is that God was making all human beings his friends through Christ. God did not keep an account of their sins, and he has given us the message which tells how he makes them his friends.
(Common English) In other words, God was reconciling the world to himself through Christ, by not counting people’s sins against them. He has trusted us with this message of reconciliation.
(Amplified) It was God [personally present] in Christ, reconciling and restoring the world to favor with Himself, not counting up and holding against [men] their trespasses [but canceling them], and committing to us the message of reconciliation (of the restoration to favor).
(Easy-to-Read) I mean that God was in Christ, making peace between the world and himself. In Christ, God did not hold people guilty for their sins. And he gave us this message of peace to tell people.



Resources:
Amplified Bible (AMP)—Copyright © 1954, 1958, 1962, 1964, 1965, 1987 by The Lockman Foundation
Barnes, Albert (Barnes) Albert Barnes' Notes on the New Testament by Albert Barnes Published in Philadelphia, August 25th, 1832
Beck, William F. (Beck) The New Testament in the Language of Today by William F. Beck, St. Louis, MO Concordia Publishing House 1963
Clarke, Adam (Clarke) Adam Clarke's Commentary by Adam Clarke Published in 1825
Common English Bible (CEB) Copyright © 2011 by Common English Bible
Cotton Patch Version (Cotton Patch)—Copyright © 1968 by Clarence Jordan
Easy-to-Read Version (Easy-to-Read) Copyright © 2006 by World Bible Translation Center
Good News Translation (GNT) Copyright © 1992 by American Bible Society
Moffatt, James (Moffatt) The New Testament by James Moffatt London: Hodder & Stoughton 1913
New English Translation (NET) NET Bible® copyright ©1996-2006 by Biblical Studies Press, L.L.C. http://netbible.com All rights reserved.
Wade, G. Woosung (Wade) The Documents of the New Testament translated by G.W. Wade, London: Thomas Murby & Co., 1934
Wand, J.W.C.; (Wand) The New Testament Letters prefaced and paraphrased by J.W.C. Wand, Melbourne: Oxford University Press 1944
*Hankins, Mark (MHM) The New Creation study guide by Mark Hankins
Mark Hankins Ministries - PO Box 12863 - Alexandria, LA 71315 - (318) 767-2001   
Study guide transcribed by Jim Hughes from 1985 copy — jimhughesgraphics@gmail.com / Jim Hughes is not affiliated with (MHM)




Saturday, January 11, 2014

VTG Notes Pages xi and xii

This is a study of the a Lexicon work directly transcribed from: Vocabulary of the Greek Testament by James Hope Moulton and George Milligan, Published by Hodder And Stoughton, Limited London, 1914-1929
*Notes in [brackets] are my edit notes —Jim Hughes.
—www.dictionary.com
a  Dictionary, esp one of an ancient language such as Greek or Hebrew
C17: New Latin, from Greek lexikon , n use of lexikos  relating to words, from Greek lexis  word, from legein  to speak
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page xi:

"New Testament Greek." [Research of the non-Biblical Egyptian papyri found in the early 1860s] 
—It is with this aspect of the papyri that we are primarily concerned. Alike in Vocabulary and Grammar the language of the New Testament exhibits striking dissimilarities from Classical Greek ; and in consequence it has been regarded as standing by itself as " New Testament Greek." In general it had been hastily classed as "Judaic" or "Hebraic" Greek; its writers being Jews (with the probable exception of St. Luke), and therefore using a language other than their own, a language filled with reminiscences of the translation-Greek of the a Septuagint on which they had been nurtured. 1 But true as this may be, it does not go far to explain the real character of the Greek which meets us in the New Testament writings.

For a convincing explanation we have in the first instance to thank the German scholar, Adolf Deissmann, now Professor of New Testament Exegesis in the University of Berlin. While still a pastor at Marburg, Dr. (then Mr.) Deissmann happened one day to be turning over in the University Library at Heidelberg a new section of a volume containing transcripts from the collection of Greek Papyri at Berlin. And, as he read, he was suddenly struck by the likeness of the language of these papyri to the language of the Greek New Testament. Further study deepened in his mind the extent of this likeness, and he realized that he held in his hand the real key to the old problem. [of translating Greek New Testament language]

So far from the Greek of the New Testament being a language by itself, or even, as one German scholar called it, " a language of the Holy Ghost," 2  its main feature was that it was the ordinary vernacular Greek of the period, not the language of contemporary literature, which was often influenced by an attempt to imitate the great authors of classical times, but the language of everyday life, as it was spoken and written by the ordinary men and women of the day, or, as it is often described, the Koivuh vor Common Greek, of the great Graeco-Roman world. That, then, is Deissmann's general conclusion, which quickly found an enthusiastic . . .

—www.dictionary.com
a The oldest Greek version of the Old Testament, traditionally said to have been translated by 70 or 72 Jewish scholars at the request of Ptolemy II: most scholars believe that only the Pentateuch was completed in the early part of the 3rd century B.C. and that the remaining books were translated in the next two centuries.

1 Cf. W. F. Howard's Appendix " Semitisms in the New Testament" in Grammar of New Testament Greek by J. H. Moulton and W. F. Howard (Edinburgh, 1929), Vol. II, p. 411 ff.

2 R. Rothe, Zur Dogmatik (Gotha, 1863), p. 238: "We can indeed with good right speak of a language of the Holy Ghost. For in the Bible it is manifest to our eyes how the Divine Spirit at work in revelation always takes the language of the particular people chosen to be the recipient, and makes of it a characteristic religious variety by transforming existing linguistic elements and existing conceptions into a shape peculiarly appropriate to that Spirit. This process is shown most clearly by the Greek of the New Testament" (quoted by Deissmann, The Philology of the Greek Bible (London, 1908), p. 42 f.).

Page xii:

and brilliant advocate in this country in the person of Dr. J. H. Moulton. And though the zeal of the first discoverers of the new light [these papyri] may have sometimes led them to go rather far in ignoring the a Semitisms, on the one hand, and the literary culture of the New Testament writers, on the other, their main conclusion has found general acceptance, and we have come to realize with a definiteness unknown before that the book intended for the people was written in the people's own tongue. Themselves sprung from the common people, the disciples of One Whom the common people heard gladly, its writers, in their turn, wrote in the common tongue to be " understanded of the people."

In the Prolegomena to his translation of Winer's well-known Grammar of New Testament Greek, published in 1859, Professor Masson, at one time Professor in the University of Athens, writes:
—the New Testament may be considered as exhibiting the only genuine facsimile of the colloquial diction employed by unsophisticated Grecian gentlemen of the first century, who spoke without b pedantry— as idiwtai ('private persons'), and not as sofistai ('adepts')" (p. vii. f.).1

—www.dictionary.com
a a word or idiom peculiar to, derived from, or characteristic of a Semitic language, especially of hebrew.
b the habit or an instance of being a pedant, esp in the display of useless knowledge or minute observance of petty rules or details.
1 Cf. J. Rendel Harris, Exp T, xxv. p. 54 f., and notes by the present writer in ib. xxxi.
p. 421, and xxxii. p. 231 f.

A second statement to much the same effect will be found in the article "Greek Language (Biblical)," contributed by Mr. (afterwards Principal Sir James) Donaldson to the third edition of Kitto's Cyclopaedia of Biblical Literature, edited by Dr. W. Lindsay Alexander (Edinburgh, 1876). In Vol. ii. p. 170, the writer states :
Now it seems to us that the language used by the Septuagint and N(ew) T(estament) writers was the language used in common conversation, learned by them, not through books, but most likely in childhood from household talk, or, if not, through subsequent oral instruction.

*If this be the case, then the Septuagint is the first translation which was made for the great masses of the people in their own language, and the N(ew) T(estament) writers are the first to appeal to men through the common vulgar language intelligible to all who spoke Greek.

The common Greek thus used is indeed considerably modified by the circumstances of the writers, but these modifications no more turn the Greek into a peculiar dialect than do Americanisms or Scotticisms turn the English of Americans and Scotsmen into peculiar dialects of English. 2

*[Yellow highlight & italics mine] WOW!!!!!!

James Donaldson: I owe the reference to a note by W. L. Lorimer in Exp T, xxxii. p. 330, where attention is also drawn to the position taken up by Salmasius in his Funus linguae Hellenisticae and his DeHellenislica Commentarius, both published in 1643.

Thursday, January 9, 2014

Thought and Study Series – Lesson 2

Lesson 2:
2 Timothy 2:15
(AMP)
15 Study and be eager and do your utmost to present yourself to God approved (tested by trial), a workman who has no cause to be ashamed, correctly analyzing and accurately dividing [rightly handling and skillfully teaching] the Word of Truth.

Lesson 1:
Mark 4:23-25
(AMP)
23 If any man has ears to hear, let him be listening and let him perceive and comprehend [the Truth].

24 And He said to them, Be careful what you are hearing. The measure [a] [of thought and study] you give [to [b] the Truth you hear] will be the measure [c] [of virtue and knowledge] that comes back to you—and more [besides] will be given to you who hear.

25 For to him who has will more [Truth] be given; and from him who has nothing, even what he has will be taken away [[d] by force],

References:
Translation retrieved from http://www.biblegateway.com/  BibleGateway.com © Copyright 1995-2013 Gospel Communications International
Amplified Bible (AMP)—Copyright © 1954, 1958, 1962, 1964, 1965, 1987 by The Lockman Foundation
a. Mark 4:24 W. Robertson Nicoll, ed., The Expositor’s Greek New Testament.
b. Mark 4:24 James C. Gray and George M. Adams, Bible Commentary; Kenneth Wuest,Word Studies; Albert Barnes, Notes on the New Testament; and others.
c. Mark 4:24 W. Robertson Nicoll, ed., The Expositor’s Greek New Testament.
d. Mark 4:25 Joseph Thayer, A Greek-English Lexicon.


FREE Album Download



Monday, January 6, 2014

Who Do You Believe

Here's a survey we can pose to our atheist friends:

Jesus says,

1) The devil is a liar and the father of all lies. (John 8:44)

and

2) I Am the only Way, the Truth, and the Life. No one comes to My Father but by Me. (John 14:6)


Based on these two statements alone, who would be more likely to be telling the truth Jesus or the devil?


Do you believe there’s a devil? If not is Jesus lying?